<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for REAL CLEAR CONSERVATIVES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realclearconservatives.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realclearconservatives.com</link>
	<description>A website dedicated to conservative and freedom oriented articles, with an emphasis on Republican political ideas, personalities, elections and strategies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:41:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does the President of the United States Really Manage the Economy? by The #Politics of #Lying #government #president #Congress #economy #budget #debt #nation CC: @KesselJunkie &#171; Rob&#039;s Blog of Controversy</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/06/10/does-the-president-of-the-united-states-really-manage-the-economy/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>The #Politics of #Lying #government #president #Congress #economy #budget #debt #nation CC: @KesselJunkie &#171; Rob&#039;s Blog of Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=476#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;re talking nonsense. To the extent that the government dictates the health of our economy (relatively little, in fact), Congress is almost completely responsible, with the president&#8217;s discretion on how to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;re talking nonsense. To the extent that the government dictates the health of our economy (relatively little, in fact), Congress is almost completely responsible, with the president&#8217;s discretion on how to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LET’S GET OUR FACTS STRAIGHT ON THE TEXAS SONOGRAM BILL by twoXchromosomes</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/14/let%e2%80%99s-get-our-facts-straight-on-the-texas-sonogram-bill/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>twoXchromosomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=383#comment-33</guid>
		<description>My sister lost her baby... and my state requires her to see the ultrasound before she aborts it.

Her and her husband were looking forward to child number 2, and the other day she went in to her exam to find that the fetus no longer had a heart beat. Her options are to either carry a dead baby with her till she either miscarries or gives birth, or abort it (D&amp;C). The doctor agrees that abortion is by far the preferred option, however thanks to our state government, she found out today that she will have to see an ultrasound of her dead fetus AGAIN before she goes through with the operation?!

This sort of emotional horror should never have to happen.

She heard (from the clinic that is supposed to preform the operation) that she is going to have to either SEE the fetus, or if she looks away, she will have to hear a description of it (the fetus).  Why on earth did the state government felt this was such a priority of a bill that they (no exaggeration) rushed it under an emergency status?

For the record-- My sister was 12 weeks along and is 30 years old.

I would LOVE to hear your response to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister lost her baby&#8230; and my state requires her to see the ultrasound before she aborts it.</p>
<p>Her and her husband were looking forward to child number 2, and the other day she went in to her exam to find that the fetus no longer had a heart beat. Her options are to either carry a dead baby with her till she either miscarries or gives birth, or abort it (D&amp;C). The doctor agrees that abortion is by far the preferred option, however thanks to our state government, she found out today that she will have to see an ultrasound of her dead fetus AGAIN before she goes through with the operation?!</p>
<p>This sort of emotional horror should never have to happen.</p>
<p>She heard (from the clinic that is supposed to preform the operation) that she is going to have to either SEE the fetus, or if she looks away, she will have to hear a description of it (the fetus).  Why on earth did the state government felt this was such a priority of a bill that they (no exaggeration) rushed it under an emergency status?</p>
<p>For the record&#8211; My sister was 12 weeks along and is 30 years old.</p>
<p>I would LOVE to hear your response to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest Political Privilege by Texas Senate Race Update for September 15, 2011 &#171; Lawrence Person&#039;s BattleSwarm Blog</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/09/11/the-greatest-political-privilege/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Senate Race Update for September 15, 2011 &#171; Lawrence Person&#039;s BattleSwarm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=573#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Ames Jones has an Op-Ed piece up on Real Clear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ames Jones has an Op-Ed piece up on Real Clear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rick Perry for President? by Texas Governor Rick Perry Considers a 2012 Presidential Campaign &#124; Neon Tommy</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/05/18/rick-perry-for-president/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Governor Rick Perry Considers a 2012 Presidential Campaign &#124; Neon Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=454#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;If you think about it analytically, Rick Perry is now almost the perfect candidate to enter the GOP field for president. Just look at his credentials from the stand point of experience, attractiveness and political philosophy,&quot; wrote contributing editor, Rudy Cajka, in a post on the blog&#160;Real Clear Conservatives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;If you think about it analytically, Rick Perry is now almost the perfect candidate to enter the GOP field for president. Just look at his credentials from the stand point of experience, attractiveness and political philosophy,&quot; wrote contributing editor, Rudy Cajka, in a post on the blog&nbsp;Real Clear Conservatives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama’s Supports Drilling for Oil – In Brazil! by Kenyan Administration Sent Aid to Mexico to Fight Wildfires But Not Texas - PerfectUnion Firearms Forum</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/22/obama%e2%80%99s-supports-drilling-for-oil-%e2%80%93-in-brazil/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenyan Administration Sent Aid to Mexico to Fight Wildfires But Not Texas - PerfectUnion Firearms Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=405#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT A DANGEROUS GIMMICK? by Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#124; Tea Party Tribune - Tea Party &#38; Political News</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/30/is-a-balanced-budget-amendment-a-dangerous-gimmick/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#124; Tea Party Tribune - Tea Party &#38; Political News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=422#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT A DANGEROUS GIMMICK? by Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; Speak Without Interruption</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/30/is-a-balanced-budget-amendment-a-dangerous-gimmick/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; Speak Without Interruption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=422#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT A DANGEROUS GIMMICK? by Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; Real Life Episodes</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/30/is-a-balanced-budget-amendment-a-dangerous-gimmick/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; Real Life Episodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=422#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT A DANGEROUS GIMMICK? by Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; People Advising People</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/30/is-a-balanced-budget-amendment-a-dangerous-gimmick/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; People Advising People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=422#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT A DANGEROUS GIMMICK? by Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; The History of the Future</title>
		<link>http://realclearconservatives.com/2011/03/30/is-a-balanced-budget-amendment-a-dangerous-gimmick/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam Plays You Pay &#171; The History of the Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclearconservatives.com/?p=422#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now is that in exchange for raising the debt limit there must be meaningful movement towards a balanced budget amendment.  That sounds so encouraging.  If we just had a balanced budget amendment the problem will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
